<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pests of NY-Interactive I edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu</link>
	<description>A Pipeline to the Pest of NY Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:09:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NYC&#8217;s Taxis of Today by Flossie Stimple</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/11/18/nycs-taxis-of-today/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Flossie Stimple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 13:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=2093#comment-117</guid>
		<description>some  truly   superb  info  , Glad    I found  this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some  truly   superb  info  , Glad    I found  this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Standardized Tests: Necessary Evils&#8230;or Just Evils? by Reina Tickle</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/16/standardized-tests-necessary-evils-or-just-evils/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Reina Tickle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=199#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Great post, thanks a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, thanks a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do you think about glue traps? by Paul Slattery</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/23/what-do-you-think-about-glue-traps/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Slattery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=345#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hi, I&#039;m actually from Victoria, Australia. The ban has taken place because it was found through a scientific study that glue traps are just a little too inhumane. There have also been many public complaints of these things. These pest control operators may claim that the ban &quot;puts rats above humans&quot;, but that is quite a load of rubbish considering the people behind the ban recommend alternatives. Not to mention that fact that pest control operators may still use them, just not the public (because let&#039;s face it, these things are really terrible in ignorant hands). These lobby groups only care about their wallet, and don&#039;t give a damn about the cruelty aspect of this. 

For them to suggest this is putting it above human issues is simply a strawman argument. One can certainly care about both.

As for your question, I think it is a good idea to ban them. It is better to be progressive rather than hold on to crude and brutal methods that really have no place in civilised society. The aim is to kill them, not cause as much pain as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I&#8217;m actually from Victoria, Australia. The ban has taken place because it was found through a scientific study that glue traps are just a little too inhumane. There have also been many public complaints of these things. These pest control operators may claim that the ban &#8220;puts rats above humans&#8221;, but that is quite a load of rubbish considering the people behind the ban recommend alternatives. Not to mention that fact that pest control operators may still use them, just not the public (because let&#8217;s face it, these things are really terrible in ignorant hands). These lobby groups only care about their wallet, and don&#8217;t give a damn about the cruelty aspect of this. </p>
<p>For them to suggest this is putting it above human issues is simply a strawman argument. One can certainly care about both.</p>
<p>As for your question, I think it is a good idea to ban them. It is better to be progressive rather than hold on to crude and brutal methods that really have no place in civilised society. The aim is to kill them, not cause as much pain as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Death Wish: The Infestation by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/17/death-wish-the-infestation/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=239#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I hope you aren&#039;t advocating unnecessary cruelty to animals here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you aren&#8217;t advocating unnecessary cruelty to animals here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What do you think about glue traps? by Chuck</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/23/what-do-you-think-about-glue-traps/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 21:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=345#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Yes, they are morally reprehensible. Considering there are more painless ways to kill them, allowing them to starve on a sheet of glue while they pull and gnaw bits of themselves off is unacceptable. It&#039;s basically torture. I can&#039;t see how an argument can be made for the &quot;ends justifying the means&quot;, because the ends can be just as accomplished without all the torture and pain. So why cause all that excessive suffering? Is being lazy an excuse? I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any excuse to torture something to death - they ought to be illegal, these glue traps. And they already are in some countries in fact.

The trap instructions encourage people just to &quot;chuck them&quot; out into the rubbish, that presumably means starving them to death. When they attempt to get off (which they will),  they&#039;ll get pretty badly injured. This is really, in the end, animal abuse, because this level of agony can quite easily be avoided. No point to it at all, unless one is a sadist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, they are morally reprehensible. Considering there are more painless ways to kill them, allowing them to starve on a sheet of glue while they pull and gnaw bits of themselves off is unacceptable. It&#8217;s basically torture. I can&#8217;t see how an argument can be made for the &#8220;ends justifying the means&#8221;, because the ends can be just as accomplished without all the torture and pain. So why cause all that excessive suffering? Is being lazy an excuse? I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any excuse to torture something to death &#8211; they ought to be illegal, these glue traps. And they already are in some countries in fact.</p>
<p>The trap instructions encourage people just to &#8220;chuck them&#8221; out into the rubbish, that presumably means starving them to death. When they attempt to get off (which they will),  they&#8217;ll get pretty badly injured. This is really, in the end, animal abuse, because this level of agony can quite easily be avoided. No point to it at all, unless one is a sadist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Expensive Living In NYC: What Exactly Are We Paying For? by Candice</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/16/expensive-living-in-nyc-what-exactly-are-we-paying-for/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=206#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve lived in NYC my whole life. When I was a kid my dad was paying $900 for our  2 bedroom apt with a terrace.  At 27, that would barely get me a studio in a semi-shady neighborhood or a room in an apt.  

I have a lot of friends in their late 30&#039;s/early 40&#039;s who are still living with roommates and don&#039;t want to be.  

Unfortunately because no one can buy everyone is  renting in a city that was already pretty expensive.  It&#039;s getting to the point where I&#039;m considering leaving my city because I can&#039;t afford to live here anymore.

It really is a landlord&#039;s market and most landlords are pretty terrible people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve lived in NYC my whole life. When I was a kid my dad was paying $900 for our  2 bedroom apt with a terrace.  At 27, that would barely get me a studio in a semi-shady neighborhood or a room in an apt.  </p>
<p>I have a lot of friends in their late 30&#8242;s/early 40&#8242;s who are still living with roommates and don&#8217;t want to be.  </p>
<p>Unfortunately because no one can buy everyone is  renting in a city that was already pretty expensive.  It&#8217;s getting to the point where I&#8217;m considering leaving my city because I can&#8217;t afford to live here anymore.</p>
<p>It really is a landlord&#8217;s market and most landlords are pretty terrible people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lousy Language by Elizabeth Wright</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/16/lousy-language/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=202#comment-23</guid>
		<description>On behalf of Jo Wright: the word &#039;love&#039; is over-used. &quot;I love this&quot;, &quot;I love that&quot;, &quot;Oh, I LOVE her&quot;! But do you really? The true meaning behind the word begins to be lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On behalf of Jo Wright: the word &#8216;love&#8217; is over-used. &#8220;I love this&#8221;, &#8220;I love that&#8221;, &#8220;Oh, I LOVE her&#8221;! But do you really? The true meaning behind the word begins to be lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edible Pests by Jennifer Hamblett</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/03/edible-pests/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Hamblett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=130#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I particularly like this piece.... http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/the-bugs-you-can-eat/?ref=dining</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly like this piece&#8230;. <a href="http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/the-bugs-you-can-eat/?ref=dining" rel="nofollow">http://dinersjournal.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/21/the-bugs-you-can-eat/?ref=dining</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edible Pests by Jennifer Hamblett</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/03/edible-pests/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Hamblett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 23:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=130#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lily, I know the whole media has gone bug-eating mad....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lily, I know the whole media has gone bug-eating mad&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Edible Pests by Lily Rothman</title>
		<link>http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/2010/09/03/edible-pests/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Lily Rothman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 21:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandeep.journalism.cuny.edu/?p=130#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Jenny, you totally scooped the Times!
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/dining/22bug.html?hp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenny, you totally scooped the Times!<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/dining/22bug.html?hp" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/dining/22bug.html?hp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using memcached
Object Caching 407/526 objects using apc

 Served from: journalism.cuny.edu @ 2013-05-19 17:46:54 by W3 Total Cache -->